MVP has openly expressed his views on the differences between AEW’s Tony Khan and WWE’s Paul "Triple H" Levesque, making it clear where his allegiance lies. In a recent interview on Q101’s wrestling segment, MVP highlighted the distinct approaches to creative control at both companies. He praised Tony Khan for fostering a collaborative and supportive environment that empowers wrestlers and values their input. Conversely, MVP described WWE under Triple H as more dictatorial, with a rigid, authoritarian leadership style.
MVP acknowledged that Tony Khan has his own vision but works alongside the talent to shape the creative direction. He contrasted this with WWE’s approach, where decisions come from the top down, emphasizing control and authority. MVP also pointed out the stark contrast between the locker room atmospheres: WWE feels tense, corporate, and fear-driven, while AEW offers a more relaxed, open environment free from paranoia about job security.
He went on to say that this difference creates a healthier workplace in AEW, praising Tony Khan not just as a better leader, but as a better person compared to WWE’s management. MVP shared that working under Khan lifted the psychological pressure that many wrestlers face in WWE. He has no regrets about switching to AEW, crediting Khan with giving him creative freedom and revitalizing the spirit of professional wrestling.
Fan Take: This candid comparison from a well-respected wrestler like MVP shines a spotlight on the cultural divide between WWE and AEW. For WWE fans, it raises critical questions about the company’s management style and how it could impact the future of its talent and the sport itself.
