When Triple H assumed creative control from Vince McMahon a few years ago, WWE fans were genuinely thrilled. His impressive work with NXT had set high expectations, and many believed he was the right person to reignite the passion for professional wrestling in the world’s largest sports entertainment company. At first, his leadership brought major improvements—matches became more meaningful, mid-card titles gained importance, and WrestleMania regained its reputation as the premier wrestling event globally. Although Triple H was a prominent figure in promoting WWE, frequently appearing on ESPN, the Pat McAfee show, and even the Netflix series WWE Unreal, he wisely kept a low profile on WWE programming, understanding the spotlight wasn’t meant to be on him. However, as WWE’s creative output has dwindled over the past year, fans have grown increasingly frustrated with his vision and frequent media presence, feeling disconnected from the product he champions.
Following WWE’s acquisition by TKO, fans initially hoped that Triple H’s involvement would keep the company’s essence intact. While early changes were subtle, the company’s focus seemingly shifted heavily toward making money, marked by rising ticket costs, expensive broadcasting deals like WWE’s move from Peacock to ESPN, and controversial endeavors such as hosting Royal Rumble events in Saudi Arabia. Triple H appears to have aligned more with TKO’s business priorities than with his original creative passion. His unwillingness to address tough questions—like those about Vince McMahon during the PLE press conference—and working smoothly within politically contentious spaces, including ties to former President Donald Trump, have further fueled fan discontent.
The core issue lies in the consistent decline in the quality of WWE’s shows, which has led to dropping viewership and disengaged audiences. Many fans are willing to overlook politics or business decisions if the wrestling product remains strong, but lately, every episode feels monotonous, often ending in predictable finishes or backstage segments. This dissatisfaction has spilled over into live reactions, with audiences booing Triple H and expressing frustration directly at WWE events. Wrestling journalist Dave Meltzer noted internal criticism of Triple H’s booking approach, highlighting frequent last-minute changes to major plans, such as those for WrestleMania, leading to doubts about the company’s direction and attendance at events. The lack of compelling storylines beyond a few exceptions, combined with disappointing venue choices, has led to widespread questions about whether Triple H has lost his touch or is too focused on the business side rather than creative excellence.
WWE’s image and success are currently tied heavily to Triple H, and while calling for his resignation may be premature—especially given the risk of a worse replacement—there is a clear need for him to step back. Reducing his media appearances, allowing others to help shape the company’s future, and empowering talent to drive storylines could help reconnect WWE with its audience. Similar to how AEW fans became weary of seeing Tony Khan constantly front and center during tough times, WWE fans now desire a break from Triple H’s omnipresence. For the sake of his legacy and the health of professional wrestling, Paul Levesque should consider taking a step back and letting new creative voices lead the charge.
Fan Take: This situation matters because Triple H’s role as the face of WWE directly impacts how fans perceive the brand’s future and creative direction. If WWE wants to regain its former glory, it may be time for fresh leadership that prioritizes storytelling and fan engagement over corporate interests—something that could reshape the wrestling world for the better.
